With the all-new Grand i10 Nios, Hyundai hopes to go away a mark within the small hatchback segment, where Maruti Suzuki’s Swift rules roost with the very best sales. little question because of its sporty design, spacious cabin, and efficient powertrains. Hyundai would need to bring everything they have to possess an opportunity, then swift vs Hyundai i10nios.
But, in typical Hyundai fashion, a fully-loaded petrol automatic isn’t available – something that Maruti realised people wanted, and remedied with the (expensive) Swift ZXi++ last year, though they did not have a car to lend us for this shoot which is why you see a lower variant here. the very best spec automatic Nios you’ll have, however, may be a Sportz variant, and therefore the Asta is that the one that gets most of the headline features. Does that hurt the Nios’ chances? Let’s start right at the highest .
Hyundais are becoming edgy! a minimum of that is the impression from the front of the Nios, with its wide grille, boomerang LED DRLs, sharply creased hood, scalloped bumpers, and detailed headlights. It’s an interpretation of the family face from the sooner Grand i10 but I do not think anyone would mistake the new one for cute anymore. There are bits of Santro in there too, and therefore the rear may be a ringer for the Tata Tiago. The boot lid does have one badge too many thereon, in stark contrast to the Swift’s near-de-badged look.
The Swift is additionally the visibly larger car, being both 35mm longer and an honest 55mm wider than the Nios, though both cars have an equivalent 2,450mm wheelbase. It’s got a more squat stance thereto , and therefore the rising windowline and flared haunches are a Swift trademark, which have aged quite well. The Swift ZXi+ gets the dramatic LED headlights and DRLs, while the lower variant we borrowed from a lover gets more ordinary looking halogen headlights – this car also has a superb , subtle body kit from the dealer applied. The Nios gets halogen projectors, which look quite expensive and upmarket, up close a minimum of
Though, the Swift AMT rides on 15-inch alloy wheels with meatier rubber, sized 185/65, while the Nios AMT looks a touch awkward on its 14-inch wheel and spindly 165/65 tyre combo. Again, the ZXi+ Swift gets striking diamond cut alloys, while the Nios’ wheels are painted slate grey. And while the Nios warrants a re-evaluation now due to its novelty, i do know which one I always find yourself looking back towards after I park it is the Swift that gets style points on behalf of me .
Again, Hyundai is getting cabin aesthetics spot on with their new cars. From the Santro to the Venue and now the Grand i10, all of them have an air of premiumness inside. The Nios benefits from unique and great looking grey upholstery, with touches just like the rotary AC vents and indented dash panel helping. The 8-inch touchscreen infotainment with Apple/Android connectivity, Arkamys sound and 6 speakers is slick and gets bonus points for having physical controls also .
This is the simplest looking/most practical cabin of the segment, though it falters in few areas. Unfortunately, the Nios’ intrumentation looks a touch bare with its analogue-digital set-up for revs and driver information. it’s like Hyundai almost gave it a full set of analogue dials then decided to chop costs. The Sportz misses out on the extras that the Asta gets just like the wireless charging feature, though it does have twin USB charge ports up front. Also unfortunate are the fixed headrests all around, another area where the higher-specced Asta gets a minimum of does better, offering adjustable headrests within the rear.
The Swift, thankfully, gets adjustable headrests front and rear. And despite the all-black cabin, it feels more spacious inside because of the additional width. The hard, shiny plastics within the Swift would seem to be a touch lower rent than within the Nios, though the binnacle instrumentation with its dramatic red backlit borders might just be my favorite set of dials in any car this side of Rs 15 lakh. Only the top-end variant gets the Maruti 7-inch touchscreen infotainment, with Apple/Android integration. actually, it gets everything you’ll want including automatic headlights, push start/stop and a rear windshield wiper, but it all comes at a price. The Nios evens things out by offering a cooled glovebox and rear AC vents.
Up front, the Swift’s seats offer great bolstering and support, though people with a heftier build may find that a touch uncomfortable. Kneeroom within the rear of the Nios is marginally better than the Swift because of its clever use of space, but it can’t hide the very fact that it’s narrower. Three adults within the rear bench of the Swift would be easier , that’s needless to say . Headroom in both might be a problem for anyone over six feet tall, and therefore the Nios’ headrests don’t really support taller passenger’s necks
|RAND i10 NIOS VS SWIFT | PRICE COMPARISONEX-SHOWROOM, DELHI|
|Hyundai Grand i10 Nios||Maruti Suzuki Swift|
|Variants||Price (in lakh)||Variants||Price (in lakh)|
|Sportz Dual Tone||₹6.75||ZXI+||₹7.58|
|Key Features||Hyundai Grand i10 Nios||New Maruti Suzuki Swift|
|Price||₹ 5.13 Lakh||₹ 5.19 Lakh|
|Mileage||20.70 Kmpl||22.00 Kmpl|
|Power||82 bhp||82 bhp|
|Engine||1197 CC||1197 CC|
|GRAND i10 NIOS VS SWIFT | PRICE COMPARISONEX-SHOWROOM, DELHI|
|Hyundai Grand i10 Nios||Maruti Suzuki Swift|
|Variants||Price (in lakh)||Variants||Price (in lakh)|
Hyundai Grand i10 Nios prices start from Rs. 5.07 lakh and go up to Rs. 7.70 lakh for petrol manual powertrain. The Maruti Suzuki Swift petrol manual prices start from Rs. 5.19 lakh and go up to Rs. 7.58 lakh.
Despite what the numbers say (268 litres for the Swift, vs 260 litres for the Nios), the Swift’s cargo deck is wider again, and therefore the 60:40 split offers more flexibility than the Nios.
Hyundai and Maruti Suzuki offer the bare minimum of two airbags as standard across the range and will stand to find out a thing or two from Ford, or maybe Renault – both offer to four airbags on similarly, or lower-priced hatchbacks. The Swift’s adjustable headrests all around are an enormous plus point.
The Grand i10 and Swift have always been very closely matched on paper – both have 1.2-liter petrol engines (both BSVI compliant) with 83PS of power, 113Nm torque, and 5-speed AMTs. The Swift features a slight advantage within the 0-100kmph dash, with a time of 13.6s to the Nios’ 13.9s, and therefore the K12B engine within the Swift is more refined. But, the additional development time Hyundai has put into their new in-house AMT (first seen on the Santro) shows within the smoother, more intuitive shifts.
The Swift has a more pronounced head nod, especially on shifts at higher revs, through the primary few gears, while the Nios only seem to pause a touch longer than ideal between second and third gears. The shift points for the Nios seem to be calibrated better, shifting early (around 2,000rpm) in first to avoid jerkiness, but holding onto second a touch longer (between 2,500-3,000rpm) within the city. Swift’s AMT on the opposite hand is susceptible to upshifting early all the time, which suggests you will have to recalibrate your driving style. Both these AMTs have trouble selecting the proper gear for uphill climbs and wish a firm throttle foot to avoid upshifting and rupture of the facility mid-way through. Importantly, Hyundai has finally managed to urge its powertrain to perform efficiently, and therefore the Nios posts incredible figures both for the town and highway, surprisingly besting the Maruti. The Nios manages 15.7kmpl within the city, and 23.2kmpl on the highway, while the Swift managed 13kmpl within the city and 21.3kmpl on the highway.
Ride and handling
It looks just like the Nios was found out with the Swift as a benchmark, and in doing so, has the firmer ride quality. While it does an honest job of approaching a eu car’s ride quality, with a good ride at low speeds, it tends to urge a touch bouncy at high speeds. The Swift, in contrast, filters out a touch more of the road but will still crash noisily over larger ruts and imperfections. With three passengers within the car, the Swift proved to be easier and that we think both may benefit from lowered tyre pressures, though efficiency will probably hurt a touch for it.
Both these cars have light and breezy steerings, found out for agility and manoeuvrability within the city, and U-turns in either are often taken single-handed. The Nios’ steering feels a touch too wanting to return to centre, while the Swift’s is probably not eager enough, so it’ll come right down to personal preference. Out on the highway though, the Nios’ wheel weighs up enough to not require constant corrections, which you will find yourself making within the Swift.
Where that agility pays off is within the handling, where the Swift feels more alive, despite both cars lacking outright feedback from the steering. an enormous a part of that’s how they’re found out to react at the limit. The Nios, despite its skinnier tyres, can hold its line well and irons out mid-corner bumps, tending towards understeer if you push too hard. The Swift will wriggle and invite steering corrections, and go from understeer to a touch of oversteer, if you are available too hot. Again, it is a personal preference but most drivers will find the Nios more predictable in most situations.
Prices for this segment of hatchback have crept up, and therefore the Swift looks like an upscale buy, not considering the present discounts, of course. Sure, you’ll choose the Swift ZXi AMT, but you lose the touchscreen infotainment and reverse camera, and it still is marginally costlier than the Nios! And with these two otherwise trading feature for feature, ride comfort and with the surprising fuel efficiency of the Hyundai, the Nios makes a convincing case for itself, considering it’s one whole lakh of rupees cheaper and comes with a variable basic warranty up to three-year/1,00,000km, against the Swift’s two-year/40,000km standard warranty.